NATO: Canada Should Stay In Afghanistan

Secretary-General Wants 2011 Date Extended

© Laura Steiner

Aug 6, 2009
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NNDB.com
Canada should stay in Afghanistan beyond 2011 according to NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen. His comments came while visiting to Afghanistan.

Canadian troops have been a major part of the NATO (North Atlantic Trade Organization) combat mission since 2001. On a recent trip, Canadian Defense Minister Peter MacKay hinted at an extension of the mission, but not without Parliamentary support.

Why Canada Should Stay: Security

Rasmussen visited a Canadian Aid project and praised the country for its contribution. In remarks published on CBC.CA he said: “I would like to take this opportunity to express my strong appreciation to the significant contribution to our mission in Afghanistan.”

He continued arguing the reason Canada should stay is security. Afghanistan is thousands of kilometers away from Europe and is widely viewed as a haven for terrorists. Rasmussen emphasized that point in comments published by theglobeandmail.com: “At the end of the day it is a question of our own security- we cannot allow Afghanistan to once again become a safe haven to terrorists- and I also think it is in Canada’s best interest to ensure a peaceful and safe Afghanistan.”

Since the mission began NATO has had 65,000 troops from 42 member nations. Canada has 2800 soldiers serving in southern Afghanistan. Rasmussen met with Afghan government officials including President Hamid Karazi, completely assuring him he had the alliance’s support as long as needed.

Federal Government Reacts To Rasmussen Comments

Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon reacted on behalf of the federal government. In a statement published on CTV.CA he said Rasmussen’s comments recognized Canada’s contribution in Kandahar adding: “However our government is abiding by the motion passed in Parliament in 2008. That is: our combat forces will leave by 2011. We’re staying the course.” This backs Defense Minister MacKay’s previous remarks that his government would respect the will of Parliament.

Canadian troops have already begun withdrawing from countryside into cities, a sign the mission is shifting to one more humanitarian in nature. On MacKay’s recent trip he announced plans for a forensic facility examining the make-up of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED’s) at the Kandahar air base.

Other Canadian aid projects in the country include the reconstruction of Dhala Dam, as well as the construction of a model village of: Deh-E-Bagh located south of Kandahar. The village is seen as an example of how best to provide security and development in the country.

If Canada were to extend its combat mission it would take an act of Parliament. Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff suggested earlier this year his party might be willing to talk about an extension.


The copyright of the article NATO: Canada Should Stay In Afghanistan in Canadian Foreign Affairs is owned by Laura Steiner. Permission to republish NATO: Canada Should Stay In Afghanistan in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NNDB.com
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Post Your Comment
NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
What is 5+8? Incorrect, please resolve x + y!